Magnetic Particle Inspection / Flux Testing

1. Schematic overview of a magnetic particle inspection:

As with all non-destructive testing methods, the results of a magnetic particle inspection are reliable only if the inspection is performed step by step, accurately and in a reproducible manner.

  1. Surface Preparation

    Thorough removal of all dirt, paint, grease, and moisture particles from the test surface.

  2. Clamping

    Clamping the workpiece or the test area in a tailstock, headstock, or test table.

  3. Current

    Selecting the correct current based on the properties and type of the workpiece and the possible type of defect.

  4. Magnetic powders

    Application of the magnetic particles by immersing the object in a magnetic particle bath (wet testing) or by sprinkling them onto the surface (dry testing).

  5. Magnetizing Current

    Applying the magnetizing current.

  6. Investigation

    Inspection of the workpiece for defects.

  7. Documentation

    Documentation of the test results.

  8. Demagnetization

    Demagnetization using the correct magnetizing current and the appropriate field strength.

  9. Check

    Check for residual magnetism.

  10. Cleaning

    Clean the workpiece and remove all magnetic particle residues.

2. Questions and Answers About Magnetic Particle Testing

FAQs About Fluxing

Magnetic particle testing is a method of nondestructive material testing. It is also known as magnetic particle crack testing, flux testing, or flux inspection. Surface or near-surface cracks in ferromagnetic materials can be detected using this testing method.
To perform the test, the workpiece or a section of it is first magnetized. This is done by passing an electric current through the workpiece. When current is passed through the workpiece, a ring-shaped magnetic field is generated. When a field is applied perpendicular to the workpiece, a magnetic field is created along the length of the component. A combination of both methods is possible.
The magnetic field lines run parallel to the surface. Cracks or defects cause a magnetic stray field, which can be made visible using fluorescent ferromagnetic powders dispersed in suitable liquids. UV-A or blue light sources are typically used for this purpose.
This method is only suitable for defects near the surface or extending to the surface. Defects running parallel to the surface (e.g., material separations) cannot be detected.

Magnetic particle testing, often referred to as magnetic particle crack testing or flux testing, works exclusively on ferromagnetic workpieces, such as those made of steel, cobalt, or nickel. At the start of the inspection, the metal part must be magnetized. If the workpiece is too large to be fully magnetized, only the areas to be inspected are magnetized.
Magnetization creates field lines within the component that run parallel to the component’s surface. Cracks originating from the surface, as well as hidden defects up to approximately one millimeter deep within the component, disrupt these field lines by generating magnetic stray fields. In practice, these stray fields are often referred to as stray flux.
In the case of a crack or other defect, the field lines exit the magnetic material on one side of the defect and re-enter on the opposite side. This creates magnetic poles. When iron powder is distributed over this stray field, the powder accumulates at the defective location due to magnetic attraction.

The methods for magnetizing test specimens can generally be divided into current-flushing and field-flushing. If cracks in different directions are expected in a specimen, the two methods must be performed either sequentially or as a combined magnetic particle inspection procedure.

  • Current Flux: This method is suitable for detecting cracks in the longitudinal direction. To do this, the test piece is connected to the current source in such a way that a ring-shaped magnetic field is created around the test area.
  • Field magnetization: This method makes transverse cracks visible. In field magnetization, the magnetic field is generated in the longitudinal direction. To do this, the test piece is clamped in a so-called iron yoke. Cracks lying transverse to the magnetic field generate a stray flux, which is indicated by the magnetic particle testing agent.
  • Combined Magnetization: For many workpieces, the location of cracks or defects cannot be predicted in advance. Therefore, testing machines have been developed that can generate current magnetization and field penetration either individually or in combination with one another. This allows cracks of any orientation to be detected.

The specification of which magnetization method (flux method) is to be used in a specific case is always found in the workpiece’s inspection instructions.

3. Performing magnetic particle testing in daylight or in the dark

Magnetic particles, which consist largely of ferromagnetic iron oxides, are used as the testing medium. During magnetization, these are applied to the test area either in solid form (powder) or as an aqueous suspension. Cracks in components are indicated when the testing agent adheres to the escaping magnetic fields. To enhance visibility, either jet-black or otherwise colored testing agents are used for inspections conducted in daylight.

Inspection media enriched with fluorescent color particles offer higher contrast; they glow under UV light in the dark, thereby revealing even the finest defects.

4. What are the advantages and disadvantages of magnetic particle testing?

Advantages of Fluxing

  • Flux testing is particularly well-suited for inspecting unmachined surfaces and complex component geometries.
  • Clear, reproducible test results.
  • Detection of hidden cracks located just below the component surface.
  • No radiation protection required.
  • No special skill requirements for inspection personnel.

Disadvantages of Fluxing

  • Magnetic particle testing can be performed only on components made of ferromagnetic materials.
  • It detects only defects on the workpiece surface and in areas close to the surface.
  • It is not possible to assess the quality of the component at depth.

5. Applications of Magnetic Particle Testing—Typical Practical Applications

Cracks can form in components during the production of cast steel, as well as during forging, bending, rolling, or welding. A crack usually forms on the surface. Due to the notch effect, it propagates into the workpiece and causes a permanent fracture. For this reason, cracks are among the most dangerous types of defects; they must either be carefully repaired or, if they compromise the component to such an extent, the component must be rejected.

The main applications of fluxing are:

  • Weld inspection (e.g., welds on piping and boilers)
  • Cast and forged parts, particularly safety-critical components in automotive manufacturing (e.g., engine, axle, and steering parts)
  • Rolled products

Magnetic particle testing is suitable for individual parts, small batches, and mass production alike. Depending on the application and quantity, either manual test setups or complex, automated testing machines are used.

Are you looking for other testing options?

We offer you a wide range of options for testing your components.

Hand measures small metal part with height gauge on measuring table

Quality Management

We only offer high-quality products according to the highest quality standards ✓ Optimisation of the production process + constant quality controls.

Talk to us about your needs

Richter Formteile has many years of experience and in-depth expertise in the manufacture of precision metal parts using investment casting, MIM, sintering, or die-forging processes. Our customers value us as a reliable partner who provides guidance and support from the initial project inquiry through to delivery.